Re: [PATCH] mark internal functions static

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 09:30:42AM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> On 11 April 2011 23:45, Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 04/11/2011 11:40 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Chris,
> >>
> >> This didn't make it in before, so updating to 2.6.39-rc2 and resending:
> >>
> >> Prevent needless exporting of internal functions from compilation
> >> units by marking them static.
> >>
> >
> > Looks like you have line wrapping on or something, the page looks mangled.
> >  Thanks,
> 
> The only way I can solve this in gmail webmail is by attaching the patch.
> 
> Is this acceptable? I guess if the mailing list strips patches, I
> guess using both may be a get-out-of-jail...
>

Try using git send-email, that works out well.  Thanks,

Josef 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux