Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: don't kzalloc the ordered extents

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/06/2011 07:06 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
Excerpts from Arne Jansen's message of 2011-04-06 03:54:07 -0400:
On 06.04.2011 01:20, Josef Bacik wrote:
We initialize almost all of the fields when we allocate an ordered extent, so
use kmalloc instead of kzalloc and just initialize the other fields that we
don't already initialize yet.  Thanks,
Is it really worth it? we have seen a few bugs in the past resulting
from uninitialized structure element, that even made it to disk.
Using kzalloc makes maintenance much easier.
I'm a big kzalloc fan unless this particular caller shows up in
benchmarks.  Josef how much did this one help?

-chris
.1 mb/s, give or take .1 mb/s :). Just low hanging fruit since we're already doing all the initialization anyway, but it's up to you, kind of just was fixing everything I could get my hands on :). Thanks,

Josef
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux