Helmut Hullen wrote: > >> Solved (something like reverse engineering). > >> > >> I re-create the (permanent) entry /dev/btrfs-control using the > >> actual contents of "/sys/class/misc/btrfs-control/dev", and btrfs > >> is happy (and me too). > > > This is fine, and is just what udev does; it creates the correct > > device node using kernel data. > > Maybe. But if I want a cup of milk I don't buy a complete cow ... My point was that it's not so much reverse engineering, it's exactly how udev works, and that also makes it a really reliable solution. //Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
