Hallo, Goffredo, Du meintest am 03.04.11: >>> As wrote by Tomasz the minor number of the btrfs-control is >>> allocated dynamically. >> At which place? > I replied you too fast. Btrfs register a "misc" device, but its > number is not dynamically allocated (see [1] for further > information), but it is static. > $ grep BTRFS_MINOR -r include/ > include/linux/miscdevice.h:#define BTRFS_MINOR 234 Ah - there it is! I'd only searched in fs/btrfs > I can conclude that _now_ the minor is 234 and not 55. But I don't > know if it is a _stable_ interface. We'll see ... now I know the error message and the place where I can examine the actual major and minor value. Should be enough information for the next months ... Thank you! Viele Gruesse! Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
