On 03/22/2011 01:43 AM, Johann Lombardi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 04:57:13PM +0800, liubo wrote:
>> @@ -4581,8 +4583,6 @@ static struct inode *btrfs_new_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>> location->offset = 0;
>> btrfs_set_key_type(location, BTRFS_INODE_ITEM_KEY);
>>
>> - btrfs_inherit_iflags(inode, dir);
>> -
>> if ((mode & S_IFREG)) {
>> if (btrfs_test_opt(root, NODATASUM))
>> BTRFS_I(inode)->flags |= BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM;
>> @@ -4590,6 +4590,8 @@ static struct inode *btrfs_new_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>> BTRFS_I(inode)->flags |= BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW;
>> }
>>
>> + btrfs_inherit_iflags(inode, dir);
>
> The problem is that btrfs_inherit_iflags() overwrites BTRFS_I(inode)->flags with the parent's flags, so you lose BTRFS_INODE_NODATA{SUM|COW}.
>
Thanks for pointing this, will fix it.
thanks,
liubo
> Johann
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
