Re: [PATCH RFC] btrfs: Simplify locking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Chris.

On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 08:10:51PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> I went through a number of benchmarks with the explicit
> blocking/spinning code and back then it was still significantly faster
> than the adaptive spin.  But, it is definitely worth doing these again,
> how many dbench procs did you use?

It was dbench 50.

> The biggest benefit to explicit spinning is that mutex_lock starts with
> might_sleep(), so we skip the cond_resched().  Do you have voluntary
> preempt on?

Ah, right, I of course forgot to actually attach the .config.  I had
CONFIG_PREEMPT, not CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY.  I'll re-run with
VOLUNTARY and see how its behavior changes.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux