Doing an audit of where we use btrfs_search_slot only showed one place where we don't check the return value of btrfs_search_slot properly. Just fix mark_extent_written to see if btrfs_search_slot failed and act accordingly. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/btrfs/file.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c index 3786eca..a85b044 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c @@ -608,6 +608,8 @@ again: key.offset = split; ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, -1, 1); + if (ret < 0) + goto out; if (ret > 0 && path->slots[0] > 0) path->slots[0]--; -- 1.7.2.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
