Excerpts from Miao Xie's message of 2011-02-17 00:48:40 -0500: > Compare with Ext3/4, the performance of file creation and deletion on btrfs > is very poor. the reason is that btrfs must do a lot of b+ tree insertions, > such as inode item, directory name item, directory name index and so on. > > If we can do some delayed b+ tree insertion or deletion, we can improve the > performance, so we made this patch which implemented delayed directory name > index insertion/deletion and delayed inode update. This work is really cool, thanks for doing it. I'm starting a run on this tonight and if all goes well I'll review in detail and try to queue it along with the per-subvolume storage bits for .39. Thanks! -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
