Re: version (was: btrfs, broken design?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/21/2011 03:32 PM, Diego Calleja wrote:
> On Viernes, 21 de Enero de 2011 10:54:00 Helmut Hullen escribió:
> 
>> And I never have seen somethin like "Changelog" - that would be fine  
>> too.
> 
> Check the wiki, I keep that updated: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page#News


I like the Changelog on the wiki [1] very much, since it shows the most
important changes in easily understandable language. Unfortunately, the
most recent change is 2.6.35 (august 2010), while we are currently at
2.6.37 (stable) and 2.6.38-rc2 (mainline). Especially 2.6.38(-rc2)
contains many interesting new btrfs features and lots of important
fixes. It would be very nice if the Changelog could list/explain those.

[1] https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog

The News [2] section on the Main page does mention one more version,
2.6.37. But the news section is less elaborate than the Changelog and
also I notice that 2.6.36 is not mentioned in the News section. Still,
2.6.36 does contain all kinds of btrfs-related changes.

[2] https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page#News

Diego, pls don't read anything negative in my comments, I enjoy and
respect your work very much! If you could find time to add those latest
changes to the wiki, it would be greatly appreciated.

Kind regards,

Erik.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux