Re: Kernel error during btrfs balance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> [104178.827624] entry offset 8891924480, bytes 4096, bitmap yes
>> [104178.827626] block group has cluster?: no
>> [104178.827628] 0 blocks of free space at or bigger than bytes is
>> [104178.827631] block group 17213423616 has 5368709120 bytes, 5368709120
>> used 0 pinned 0 reserved
>> [104178.827634] block group has cluster?: no
>>
>> And so on.
>>
>> Does this indicate an error of any sort, or is this expected behaviour?
> 
>    As far as I know, it means that you've run out of space, and not
> every block group has been rewritten by the balance process.
> 
>    Hugo.
> 

It is a 300GB volume with 79GB free. So hardly out of space. Moreover, I
started the balance operation with the sole purpose of reclaiming some
free space. The volume had like 40GB less free space when balance
started, which was used by / reserved for Metadata.

Kind regards,

Erik.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux