Counter question: Why should I? :) I used dm-crypt with luks some time ago, but it is really slooow. So I talked with the dm-crypt devs. and they gave me the hint to test loop-aes, for more speed. It is about 4x faster for me :) And I don't see any advantages using dm-crypt instead of loop-aes. Felix On 24. January 2011 - 08:53, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:53:41 +0700 > From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <list@xxxxxxxxx> > To: Felix Blanke <felixblanke@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Bug in mkfs.btrfs?! > > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Felix Blanke <felixblanke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I tried the newest version 2.19-rc1. There seems to be some kind of "fix": > > > > scooter ~ # /home/fame/tmp/util-linux-2.19-rc1/mount/losetup -a > > /dev/loop0: [0010]:3154 > > (/dev/disk/by-id/ata-INTEL_SSDSA2M160G2GC_CVPO939201JX160AGN-pa*), encryption (type > > 16) > > > If the path is to long they add a '*' :) Do you think that will solve the problem? > > It shouldn't. > > However, since you're using loopback for encryption, why not use > dm-crypt instead? > > -- > Fajar ---end quoted text--- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
