On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:54:00AM +0100, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, Chris, > > Du meintest am 20.01.11: > > >> Is there a planned date for the final release of btrfs? > > > A final release? We'll keep improving things for a long time. The > > biggest missing feature today is btrfsck, which I'm working on full > > time right now. > > Could it be possible to tell somewhere the actual version? > > Sometimes I download via git, > > <git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs-unstable.git> > and I never have found which version that is; "version.sh" tells > something wrong. $ git log then look at the revision ID of the top commit -- that's the closest thing to a version number we've got. When you build from the git repository, the version number that the tools report will be something like 0.19-36-g70c6c10. This means that it's 36 commits on from the version tagged as 0.19, and the last commit was g70c6c10. (This is for the userspace tools, of course -- the kernel has a similar numbering scheme, if you're not building from Linus's tagged versions). > And I never have seen somethin like "Changelog" - that would be fine > too. $ git log :) Hugo. -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk === PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- He's playing Schubert. I think Schubert is losing. ---
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
