Re: btrfs, broken design?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Btrfs has its own wiki page at https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org which you
may find more helpful than what is on wikipedia.

2011/1/20 Benoît Thiébault <benoit.thiebault@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Thanks for your answer
>
> Le 20 janv. 2011 à 22:20, Chris Mason a écrit :
>
>> There was a bug fixed as part of that discussion, and I think I also
>> better described the way the tree balancing works to Edward.
>
> Maybe the wikipedia article should be modified then, because it is not very reinsuring :-)
>
>> A final release?  We'll keep improving things for a long time.  The
>> biggest missing feature today is btrfsck, which I'm working on full time
>> right now.
>>
>> -chris
>
> Still on the wikipedia page, it's written "Btrfs 1.0 (with finalized on-disk format) was originally slated for a late 2008 release,[5] but a stable release has not been made as of January 2011.", which is also very confusing.
>
> According to you, is the version of btrfs in 2.6.37 ready for production? I mean, are there still chances that I may loose all my data if I use btrfs?
>
> Last question, do you know when the RAID-5 like capabilities will be available?
>
> Sorry to ask so many questions, I fully understand you and your team are working very hard on the project, but I was very confused by the Wikipedia article.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Ben--
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux