Re: btrfs, broken design?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for your answer

Le 20 janv. 2011 à 22:20, Chris Mason a écrit :

> There was a bug fixed as part of that discussion, and I think I also
> better described the way the tree balancing works to Edward.

Maybe the wikipedia article should be modified then, because it is not very reinsuring :-)

> A final release?  We'll keep improving things for a long time.  The
> biggest missing feature today is btrfsck, which I'm working on full time
> right now.
> 
> -chris

Still on the wikipedia page, it's written "Btrfs 1.0 (with finalized on-disk format) was originally slated for a late 2008 release,[5] but a stable release has not been made as of January 2011.", which is also very confusing.

According to you, is the version of btrfs in 2.6.37 ready for production? I mean, are there still chances that I may loose all my data if I use btrfs?

Last question, do you know when the RAID-5 like capabilities will be available?

Sorry to ask so many questions, I fully understand you and your team are working very hard on the project, but I was very confused by the Wikipedia article.

Kind regards,

Ben--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux