On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:53:51AM +0700, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > I saw a lockdep report with an instrumented 2.6.38-rc1 kernel [1]. > > Checking the code, it looks more likely a false-positive due to the > lock manipulation to satisfy lockdep, since CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is > defined. > > Is this the case? > Yeah these pop up every once and a while, its safe to just ignore it. Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
