On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 06:07:24PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote: > There are two tiny problem: > - One is When we check the chunk size is greater than the max chunk size or not, > we should take mirrors into account, but the original code didn't. > - The other is btrfs shouldn't use the size of the residual free space as the > length of of a dup chunk when doing chunk allocation. It is because the device > space that a dup chunk needs is twice as large as the chunk size, if we use > the size of the residual free space as the length of a dup chunk, we can not > get enough free space. Fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
