On 09/01/11 13:37, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Carl Cook<CACook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'd rather not do the copy again unless necessary, as it took a day.
Directories look identical, but who knows? I'm going to try and figure out how to do a file-by-file crc check, for peace of mind.
try "du --apparent-size -slh"
It should rule out any differences caused by sparse files and hardlinks.
On Sat 08 January 2011 17:26:25 Freddie Cash wrote:
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 5:25 AM, Carl Cook<CACook@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In addition to the questions below, if anyone has a chance could you advise on why my destination drive has more data than the source after this command:
# rsync --hard-links --delete --inplace --archive --numeric-ids /media/disk/* /home
Are you SURE you don't get the command mixed up? The last argument to
rsync should be the destination. Your command looks like you're
copying things to /home.
What is also important is that use of * - it means all the . files at
the top level are NOT being copied
rsync is clever enough to notice if you have the / at the end of the
source to know whether you want the directory to be put into the
destination or the contents of the directory. The / at the end of the
source means copy the contents.
This could be (I am not sure of the exact scope of --delete) the reason
why the destination has more data than the source. If --delete is not
deleting /home/.* files (if there any there).
--
Alan Chandler
http://www.chandlerfamily.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
