Re: btrfs: unable to remove the only writeable device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Paul Komkoff <i@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello.

I'm curious... why everyone is ignoring me?

Anyway. While trying to beat btrfs into submission I managed to make
it fill my dmesg with this:
[3301790.155343] block group 6435937189888 has 1073741824 bytes,
733720576 used 0 pinned 0 reserved
[3301790.155349] entry offset 6436670910464, bytes 340021248, bitmap no
[3301790.155697] block group has cluster?: no
[3301790.155700] 0 blocks of free space at or bigger than bytes is
[3301790.155705] block group 6437010931712 has 1073741824 bytes,
366215168 used 0 pinned 0 reserved
[3301790.155710] entry offset 6437377146880, bytes 707526656, bitmap no
[3301790.156055] block group has cluster?: no
[3301790.156058] 0 blocks of free space at or bigger than bytes is

... and then, as before, fails to remove device.

-- 
This message represents the official view of the voices in my head
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux