On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 03:00:08PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 02:54:33PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > > Oh well crud, I was hoping that I could leave the inode numbers as 256 for > > everything, but I forgot about readdir. So the inode item in the parent would > > have to have a unique inode number that would get spit out in readdir, but then > > if we stat'ed the directory we'd get 256 for the inode number. Oh well, > > incompat flag it is then. > > I think you're already fine: > > # mkdir TMP > # dd if=/dev/zero of=TMP-image bs=1M count=512 > # mkfs.btrfs TMP-image > # mount -oloop TMP-image TMP/ > # btrfs subvolume create sub-a > # btrfs subvolume create sub-b > ../readdir-inos . > . 256 256 > .. 256 4130609 > sub-a 256 256 > sub-b 257 256 > > Where readdir-inos is my silly test program below, and the first number is from > readdir, the second from stat. > Heh as soon as I typed my email I went and actually looked at the code, looks like for readdir we fill in the root id, which will be unique, so hotdamn we are good and I don't have to use a stupid incompat flag. Thanks for checking that :), Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
