We have been failing xfstest 228 forever, because we don't check to make sure
the new inode size is acceptable as far as RLIMIT is concerned. Just check to
make sure it's ok to create a inode with this new size and error out if not.
With this patch we now pass 228. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 4 ++++
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index d83f288..25a8fa2 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -6945,6 +6945,10 @@ static long btrfs_fallocate(struct inode *inode, int mode,
btrfs_wait_ordered_range(inode, alloc_start, alloc_end - alloc_start);
mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
+ ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, alloc_end);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out;
+
if (alloc_start > inode->i_size) {
ret = btrfs_cont_expand(inode, alloc_start);
if (ret)
--
1.6.6.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
