Re: Kernel 2.6.36 btrfs csum bugreport

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1 November 2010 00:35, Andreas Bauer <ab@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So I conclude that these messages are faulty because data is read correctly.
>  In addition, when you have more than one btrfs you cannot see from the message
>  which fs it is refering to.
>
>  Is this a raid1 or a dup array?
>
> No, plain vanilla partition on physical hard disk. Btrfs was made with the command "mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdc1" no extra arguments.

By default, metadata is duplicated, thus it could be that BTRFS is
using the correct copy of the metadata after finding checksum errors
in the first copy.

Daniel
-- 
Daniel J Blueman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux