On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 07:32:14PM +0200, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > > The package btrfs-tools needs a lot of care: > - the INSTALL file still reports that is not possible to remove a subvolume > - a lot of program are not documented (what is the meaning of btrfs-zero-log > ?) > - "btrfs dev scan" and "btrfs -a" try to read CDROM and Floppy looking for a > btrfs filesystem: only waste of time > - [...] > > I think that is better to improve the btrfs-progs and not to update btrfsctl. I'd agree, the btrfsctl command is more than a little awkward, and the btrfs command is pretty much better in every way. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
