On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:22:30AM -0500, David Nicol wrote: > On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > 3) Do delayed inode deletion. See above, but change the word insert > > with delete ;) > > And the reserved-for-the-future-but-not-used-yet flags field in the > ioctl#21 control structure gets a use: bits to indicate for the > completion of which of the potential delayed things the caller is > waiting. This is similar to the delayed allocation we already do for file data extents. It is supposed to be transparent to userland, and just a way to more efficiently poke the on disk structures. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
