Hi, On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:05 AM, David Nicol <davidnicol@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The patches for btrfsctl and btrfs programs will be coming soon; I'm > adding support for ISO8061 duration strings instead of (or in addition > to) milliseconds and thinking about switching the order of the two > args to btrfsctl -C from (path(default=.), ms(default=0)) to timeout > then path, to keep it consistent with the other btrfsctl commands. > Currently -C is special-cased in the bottom half of my btrfsctl.c > because the path isn't the last argument. > > Btrfsctl apparently allows several operations to be presented as one > set of command line arguments, sort of like find(1) does; would > someone who does that a lot please respond off-list to discuss the > ideal semantics of new commands? > The first thing I notice is that you use btrfsctl, you should base this work on the new 'btrfs' command, which is consistant in how the command are structured. You could use: btrfs filesystem sync -d <path> for example, it would be like a normal sync but waits for pending '-d'eletion. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
