Re: Current state of hot data relocation functionality

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You can patch btrfs for experimental hot relocation.
Ben Chociej posted this: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1022603
--
Anish Tondwalkar


On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Bostjan Skufca <bostjan@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Anyone?
>
> On 18 September 2010 01:33, Bostjan Skufca <bostjan@xxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I was looking into some custom fileserver options and noticed two
>> facts about ZFS - support for L2ARC (albeit not persistant across
>> reboots, which is a downer) and OpenSolaris being a dead meat. Then I
>> found out that some patches were already floating around linux
>> mailinglists, patches about hot data relocation, but unfortunately
>> nothing definitive. So I would like to ask here: what is the status of
>> hot data relocation functionality?
>>
>> I haven't had a chance to try out btrfs myself, but from what I see it
>> sure looks promising and seems like an option worth waiting on (I mean
>> this from fileserver with SSD cache point of view). So keep up the
>> good work, and thanks for an answer, if there will be one :)
>>
>> Take care,
>> b.
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux