On 2 September 2010 14:07, Chris Samuel <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02/09/10 16:50, Miao Xie wrote: > >> I just change the "2.1" to "2" in your patch, because the >> orignal code is LGPL v2.1, LGPL v2.1 permits us to apply >> the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public License instead >> of it. > Ahhh excellent, I hadn't realised that was possible; well spotted! Umm, isn't the only one that can do that the copyright holder? Disclaimer: I am not a laywer -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
