> Le 25 août 2010 à 18:57, Johannes Hirte a écrit: > > > the other big question is: > > > Is btrfs with 2.6.36 really rockstable and ready to use in > > > productive environments? > > > > I don't think so. There is at least one checksum bug and ENOSPC > > problems are also still present. > > I am planning to put 2 dedicated web hosting servers in production > (backuped every day), with 2.6.34.5 vanilla kernel. > > I also use btrfs on a 2.6.34 kernel on the backup server (rsync) for > some time. IMHO using btrfs in production is like playing Russian roulette - it might work and can be benifitable, but then, there's another side of the coin... Vennlige hilsener / Best regards roy -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk (+47) 97542685 roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ -- I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
