Re: 2.6.36-rc1 btrfs still unstable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Lunes, 16 de Agosto de 2010 17:45:29 Chris Ball escribió:
> >    Note that Btrfs does not yet have a fsck tool that can fix
> >    errors.
> >    While Btrfs is stable on a stable machine, it is currently
> >    possible
> >    to corrupt a filesystem irrecoverably if your machine crashes or
> >    loses power. This will be fixed when the fsck tool is ready.
> 
> But doesn't this happen only with cheap disks that don't honour
> barriers
> correctly?

Even with cheap drives, a filesystem shouldn't die. With stuff like ZFS, you can use all sorts of crap and still live with it. Btrfs should follow that track.

Vennlige hilsener / Best regards

roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer på norsk.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux