On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:46:22AM +0300, Ameya Palande wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > Today I was checking the Kconfig option for btrfs and it still says, > > "Btrfs filesystem (EXPERIMENTAL) Unstable disk format" > > > > I remember that some time back we had discussion about this on meego-dev > > mailing list: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg04881.html > > > > In case if you have forgotten about this, then can we still change this > > for 36-rc2? > > Yes, I'll go ahead and send this one in. > > I've spent a great deal of time trying to nail down the interaction > between raid56 stripe size and adding/removing volumes from the FS > (basically restriping the raid). > > The end result just isn't as user friendly as I wanted yet, but the raid > code is holding up very well. > > -chris Hi Chris, the other big question is: Is btrfs with 2.6.36 really rockstable and ready to use in productive environments? Thanks Morten -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
