On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 12:35:59AM -0400, Ken D'Ambrosio wrote: > Hello, all. I'm thinking of rolling out a BackupPC server, and -- based > on the strength of the recent Phoronix benchmarks > (http://benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=11156&Itemid=23) > -- had been strongly considering btrfs. But I do seem to recall that > there was some sort of hardlinks-per-directory limitation, and BackupPC > *loves* hardlinks. Would someone care to either remind me what the issue > was, or reassure me that it's been rectified? > It's because we pack inode ref's into the same item, so once the item fills up we can't add anymore refs. It's still a problem, not sure if/when its getting fixed. Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
