On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Diego Calleja <diegocg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Miércoles, 28 de Julio de 2010 00:00:18 bchociej@xxxxxxxxx escribió: >> With Btrfs's COW approach, an external cache (where data is moved to >> SSD, rather than just cached there) makes a lot of sense. Though these > > As I understand it, what your proyect intends to do is to move "hot" > data to a SSD which would be part of a Btrfs pool, and not do any > kind of SSD caching, as bcache (http://lwn.net/Articles/394672/) does? > Yes, that's correct. It's likely not going to be a cache in the traditional sense, since the entire capacity of both HDD and SSD would be available. BC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
