On 16 July 2010 14:16, Tomasz Torcz <tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 08:14:49AM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote: >> > From: Sebastian 'gonX' Jensen [mailto:gonx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> > >> > On 16 July 2010 13:55, Edward Ned Harvey <kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > Is this a good place to get a clue about the status of BTRFS? Like >> > ... Is >> > > it usable yet, and stuff like that? >> > > >> > >> > It has been in a good state for quite a while. There seems to be quite >> > a lot of people who use it on enterprise-grade hardware and servers >> > that require high reliability. >> >> Is it included in any distributions yet? Do you just need to build the latest kernel or something like that? Download the source code, and follow what it says in the INSTALL file? > > Of course it is. Fedora installer allows btrfs since for few releases now. > > -- > Tomasz Torcz Only gods can safely risk perfection, > xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx it's a dangerous thing for a man. -- Alia > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Yes, Fedora is one of the releases that has officially supported it for a while now. Additionally an initrd hook for btrfs has just been implemented for Arch Linux, so you might see btrfs being an option for that in the next version of the installer :-) Regards, Sebastian J. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
