On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 05:07:07PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote: > On Thu Jul 15 2010 16:14:31 GMT+0800 (CST), Yan, Zheng wrote: > >2010/7/15 Miao Xie<miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >>Hi, everyone > >> > >>I found btrfs will hangup when we run the sync command on my > >>x86_64 box. > >> > >>The reproduce steps is following: > >># mkfs.btrfs -s 8192 -l 8192 -n 8192 /dev/sda1 > >># mount /dev/sda1 /mnt > >># echo 1234567> /mnt/aaa > >># sync > >>(btrfs hangs up) > >> > >>It seems that the btrfs doesn't support the sectorsize which is > >>greater than the page size just like ext2/3/4, though we can use > >>mkfs.btrfs to make a filesystem with a big sectorsize. Am I right? > >> > >>If yes, we must do more check in the mkfs.btrfs. > >> > > > >yes, btrfs doesn't support the sectorsize> PAGE_size. > > > > So we must do more check in the mkfs.btrfs to avoid misuse, and I'll > add some check of the sectorsize into the mkfs.btrfs. Yes, but this is fixed up with the raid code, we'll allow different page sizes. > > BTW, I sent some patches to the btrfs community recently, but I haven't received > any reply. Could you review them for me? though I have tested them and everything > works well. > > [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: restructure try_release_extent_buffer() > [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: fix oops when leafsize is greator than nodesize > [PATCH] btrfs-progs: fix wrong extent buffer size when reading tree block Thanks, I'll go through these. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
