Sean Bartell <wingedtachikoma <at> gmail.com> writes: > > Is there a more aggressive filesystem restorer than btrfsck? It simply > > gives up immediately with the following error: > > > > btrfsck: disk-io.c:739: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root->node)' > > failed. > > btrfsck currently only checks whether a filesystem is consistent. It > doesn't try to perform any recovery or error correction at all, so it's > mostly useful to developers. Any error handling occurs while the > filesystem is mounted. > Is there any plan to implement this functionality. It would seem to me to be a pretty basic feature that is missing ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
