Re: Still ENOSPC problems with 2.6.35-rc3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Donnerstag 17 Juni 2010, 01:12:54 schrieb Yan, Zheng:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Johannes Hirte
> 
> <johannes.hirte@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > With kernel-2.6.34 I run into the ENOSPC problems that where reported on
> > this list recently. The filesystem was somewhat over 90% full and most
> > operations on it caused a Oops. I was able to delete files by trial and
> > error and freed up half of the filesystem space. Operation on the other
> > files still caused an Oops.
> > 
> > For 2.6.35 there went some patches in, that addressed this problem. Sadly
> > they don't fix it but only avoid the Oops. A simple 'ls' on this
> > filesystem results in
> 
> To avoid ENOSPC oops, btrfs in 2.6.35 reserves more metadata space for
> system use than older btrfs. If the FS has already ran out of metadata
> space, using btrfs in 2.6.35 doesn't help.
> 
> Yan, Zheng

So how can this be fixed/avoided? There must be some free metadata space, since 
I was able to delete files, more than 20Gig, mostly small files. Also from my 
understanding, when freeing space by deleting files, metadata space should be 
freed. Or do I get something wrong here? 
2.6.35 does change something, since I can delete more files, where 2.6.34 does 
Oops. But you're right, it doesn't help at all. So, where is this space and 
why it can't be used? 

regards,
  Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux