On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 01:00:02PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The others all fix oopsen or big problems, and I think fixing warnings > > helps avoid false negatives as others look for real problems? > > > > I'm happy to rebase out the 3 non-criticals. > > There seems to be more than three non-criticals. There's the warning > fixes, the "unused variables" thing, the "memdup_user()" thing, a > couple of unnecessary NULL checks removed etc. On the whole, I do not > get the feeling that the pull request was actively trying to be > minimal, and that's what I really want to see. No problem, I like to err on the side of pulling in safe fixes from the automated checkers so they don't have to go through results again. But, I've got a completely minimal rebase now and I'm double checking it. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
