On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:08 PM, K. Richard Pixley <rich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I've just started to work with btrfs so I started with a benchmark. On four > identical servers, (2 dual core cpus, single local disk), I built > filesystems - ext3, ext4, nilfs2, and btrfs. I checked out a sizable code > tree and timed a build. The build is parallelized to use 4 threads when > possible. > > I'm seeing similar build times on ext[34] and nilfs2 but I'm seeing almost > double the times for btrfs using default options. And I'm having trouble > reconciling this performance cost with the benchmarks I'm seeing around the > net. > > Is this a common result? Is there a trick to getting ext4 competitive > performance out of btrfs? Is my application a poor choice for btrfs? Am I > missing something obvious here? > Please make sure you're testing with the latest btrfs from git or linus latest kernel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
