Re: Rename+crash behaviour of btrfs - nearly ext3!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Chris Mason <chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx> [100518 09:13]:
 
> I'm more than open to discussion on this one, but I don't see how:

> Should be expected to write 1GB of data.

++

Please don't mess up BTRFS because older, less better things are messed
up in certain ways.  If we're just going to continually perpetuate the
ideas that broken-by-desing apps are "right", we might as well just give
up on a better FS, and stick to "what broken apps are expecting" (i.e.
ext3).


-- 
Aidan Van Dyk                                             Create like a god,
aidan@xxxxxxxxxxx                                       command like a king,
http://www.highrise.ca/                                   work like a slave.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux