Re: Updating RAID[56] support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I am very interested in support for this functionality. I have been
using mdadm for all of my redundant file systems, but it requires I
have homogeneous partitions/drives for a volume. I would very much
like to use a heterogeneous drive structure for a large redundant
volume and have been waiting in anticipation for btrfs to come forth
with this functionality.

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ----- "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev:
>
>> I've been looking again at the RAID5/RAID6 support, and updated the
>> tree
>> at git://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/btrfs-raid56.git#merged
>>
>> At the moment, we limit writes to a single disk's worth at a time,
>> which
>> means we _always_ do the read-calculateparity-write cycle and suffer
>> the
>> traditional RAID 'write hole' problem.
>
> Out of curiosity, will Btrfs allow for variable block sizes such as with ZFS?
>
> roy
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux