Re: Updating RAID[56] support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:39 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> > It seems to work, and recovery is successful when I mount the file
> > system with -oro,degraded. But in read-write mode it'll oops (even
> > without the below patch) because it's trying to _write_ to the degraded
> > RAID6. Last time I was testing this, it wouldn't continue to write to
> > that block group; it would allocate a new one which didn't include the
> > missing disk. What changed?
> > 
> 
> Maybe that block group isn't getting marked read only?  I'd need to see the oops
> to know what was going on.  Thanks,

Yes, it's not getting marked read-only. 

All the asynchronicity means that there isn't a clear backtrace. I put
extra checks in different places a few times, and the closest I got was 

WARNING: at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3913 btrfs_map_bio+0x482/0x6c2 [btrfs]()         
 [<ffffffffa019bbf6>] btrfs_map_bio+0x482/0x6c2 [btrfs]                         
 [<ffffffffa01777c1>] __btree_submit_bio_done+0x16/0x18 [btrfs]                 
 [<ffffffffa0178d2f>] run_one_async_done+0x8d/0x92 [btrfs]                      
 [<ffffffffa019f0c7>] run_ordered_completions+0x73/0xbe [btrfs]    

>From a check for !device->bdev in raid56_parity_write().

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx                              Intel Corporation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux