On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 06:36:15PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > Shouldn't it do that then? What's the point of fsyncing guest data if > qcow2 metadata is volatile? Not my territory - but in the end getting qcow2 as-is solid in face of crashes will be an uphill battel - I'd rather recommend not using it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
