Re: btrfs subvol find-modified

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 26 March 2010, Chris Mason wrote:

> In general, the end goal is backing up a snapshot the changes from a
> point in time to right now.  We don't actually need a snapshot to do
> this, we just need the generation number and (optionally) a timestamp.

I think that backup the difference between two snapshot has a big advantage: 
the snapshot is a coherent state.

For example what if we are doing a backup during a package installation or 
during a database working ? The risk is to take some files from an old "state" 
and other files from a new "state"...


> 
> So, we could store these things into a state file that gets fed into the
> next backup, but I'd like to keep a command that can print them as well.
> 
> -chris
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


-- 
gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint = 4769 7E51 5293 D36C 814E  C054 BF04 F161 3DC5 0512
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux