[PATCH 08/18] btrfs: Simplify num_stripes's calculation logical for __btrfs_alloc_chunk()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

We can use this simple method to make source more readable.

Signed-off-by: Zhao Lei <zhaolei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 844c393..3ae1f42 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -2198,9 +2198,9 @@ static int __btrfs_alloc_chunk(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 		min_stripes = 2;
 	}
 	if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1)) {
-		num_stripes = min_t(u64, 2, fs_devices->rw_devices);
-		if (num_stripes < 2)
+		if (fs_devices->rw_devices < 2)
 			return -ENOSPC;
+		num_stripes = 2;
 		min_stripes = 2;
 	}
 	if (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10)) {
-- 
1.6.5.2


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux