On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 at 12:01, David Miller wrote: > Can you rerun your test with the following patch applied? > It will obtain more information for the btrfs developers. Thanks, David! Here it is: [ 1861.965178] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [ 1862.060546] Caller [100a6044:crc32c+0x44/0x80 [libcrc32c]] [ 1862.126652] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] [ 1862.221928] Caller [100a6044:crc32c+0x44/0x80 [libcrc32c]] It's always libcrc32c and the numbers stay the same too. Full dmesg here: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.33-rc6/btrfs/ HTH, Christian. -- BOFH excuse #37: heavy gravity fluctuation, move computer to floor rapidly -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
