anyone on when/why to use different RAID geometries for data & metadata? On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:38 AM, 0bo0 <0.bugs.only.0@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > hi > > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 3:28 AM, RK <rkasl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> try this article "Linux Don't Need No Stinkin' ZFS: BTRFS Intro & >> Benchmarks" >> http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7308/3/ >> , there is a benchmark table and speed analysis (very informative), but >> all the benchmarks are done with same -m and -d mkfs.btrfs option > > that's one of the articles i' read. it also does mention that you can > define data/metadata as differnt RAID, afaict, it doesn't (?) say > anything about the what/why you would ... which is what i'm unclear > about. > > thanks! > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
