Re: RAID-10 arrays built with btrfs & md report 2x difference in available size?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 3:46 PM, jim owens <jowens@xxxxxx> wrote:
> but it is the only method
> that can remain accurate under the mixed raid modes possible
> on a per-file-basis in btrfs.

can you clarify, then, the intention/goal behind cmason's

"df is lying.  The total bytes in the FS include all 4 drives.  I need to
fix up the math for the total available space."

Is the goal NOT to accurately represent the actual available space?
Seems rather odd that users are simply to know/accept that "available
space" in btrfs RAID-10 != "available space" in md RIAD-10 ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux