> For me, it looks as if 2.03GB is way smaller than 931.51GB (2 << 931), no? Everything seems to be fine here. gagh! i "saw" TB, not GB. 8-/ > And regarding your original mail: it seems that df is still lying about the size of the btrfs fs, check http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg00758.html it is, and reading -> "df is lying. The total bytes in the FS include all 4 drives. I need to fix up the math for the total available space.", it looks like its under control. thx! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
