Hello Goffredo, On 22 Jan 2010, at 13:37, kreijack@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi Thomas, > >> ----Messaggio originale---- >> Da: thomas@xxxxxxxxxx >> Data: 22/01/2010 10.48 >> A: "Leszek Ciesielski"<skolima@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: "linux-btrfs"<linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Ogg: Re: mount command not honoring rootflags passed >> >> >> On 22 Jan 2010, at 10:40, Leszek Ciesielski wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Kupper <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [...] >>> Doesn't 'cat /proc/mounts' show the actually used mount options? >> >> No, it doesn't in my case - Ubuntu 9.10 with 2.6.32-10-generic kernel. >> >> thomas # cat /proc/mounts | fgrep ' / ' >> rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0 >> /dev/sda3 / btrfs rw,relatime 0 0 >> >> thomas # cat /proc/cmdline >> [...] root=/dev/sda3 ro rootflags=subvol=rootfs-snapshot-001-- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > The btrfs code doesn't show the subvol= mount option in cat /proc/mount. I > sent a patch which should solve it. > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/4487 > > But today it is not merged. Excellent! That was fast, thanks alot. I have to get around how to compile one module only first anyway (the Ubuntu or Debian way). > Br > Goffredo Have a good day, Thomas-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
