I've been running btrfs on some disks with Ubuntu kernel 2.6.31 for a
while now. Recently I had a bad USB-cable to one of those disks which
left the btrfs filesystem in a somewhat sad state. Fair enough.
What worries me is what btrfsck reports back to me during two successive
runs:
root@bollox:/home/kavli# btrfsck /dev/mapper/vg3-vbox1
checksum verify failed on 142837022720 wanted 5D18D333 found 95085E8
checksum verify failed on 142837022720 wanted 5D18D333 found 95085E8
checksum verify failed on 142837022720 wanted 5D18D333 found 95085E8
btrfsck: disk-io.c:741: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root->node)'
failed.
Aborted
root@bollox:/home/kavli# btrfsck /dev/mapper/vg3-vbox1
checksum verify failed on 142837022720 wanted 5D18D333 found 81D15E8
checksum verify failed on 142837022720 wanted 5D18D333 found 81D15E8
checksum verify failed on 142837022720 wanted 5D18D333 found 81D15E8
btrfsck: disk-io.c:741: open_ctree_fd: Assertion `!(!tree_root->node)'
failed.
Aborted
I'd expected the checksums for the two separate runs to be equal.
This is a vanilla filesystem that resides on one physical disk:
root@bollox:/home/kavli# btrfs-show /dev/mapper/vg3-vbox1
failed to read /dev/sr0
Label: none uuid: 08078f2f-22e0-4b79-8367-66528791afff
Total devices 1 FS bytes used 106.79GB
devid 1 size 232.88GB used 218.04GB
path /dev/mapper/vg3-vbox1
Btrfs Btrfs v0.19
I've googled a bit and found one case with a similar problem in a raid1
setup (I guess incorrectly stated as raid0):
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg03429.html
There were no followups beyond that point which stated the cause of this
behaviour.
BTW: Is there any hope of recovery of this filesystem, or is it just a
new mkfs that can help?
Regards,
-- RHK
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html