Re: btrfs fallocate woes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 09:27:38AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> 
>  > if you run it on ext4, it will create a 4-byte file with "test" in it.
>  > On btrfs, however, the file size would be 4096, and the remaining
>  > space will be filled with zeroes.
> 
> My fallocate man page says:
> 
>        Because allocation is done in block size chunks, fallocate() may
>        allocate a larger range than that which was specified.
> 
> so the btrfs behavior seems OK to me.
> 
> You say this is a regression.  What btrfs version behaved differently?

The file size should still be 4 bytes I think, even if we allocate 4096.

-chris

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux